Traffic Technology
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
Automated License Plate Recognition: An Insider’s Look
What are some of the newest, extensive uses of this technology and how can they be best utilized?
Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) systems – made up of a camera or cameras, a processor and character recognition software – at their most basic are designed to capture license plate images, transform them into characters and compare the results to a database of license plates which are of interest to law enforcement. We asked six industry experts to fill us in on the state of the technology and what we can expect in the future.
“Five, or even ten, years ago, the common use in the US would undoubtedly be to recover stolen vehicles and ticket vehicles with expired license plate registrations. However, with advancements in the technology and more agencies adopting the technology, the uses of ALPR technology have grown wings…registrations and stolen vehicles are still common practice for ALPR, but so, too, are criminal investigations such as burglaries, kidnappings, homicides, and identification of trafficking patterns,” says Heather Fraser, Marketing Manager for NDI Recognition Systems.
“For law enforcement, ALPR can be broken into two categories: immediate vehicle detection and investigations,” says Peter Crary, US ALPR Operations Director for Neology’s PIPS Technology™. “ALPR is very appealing for immediate vehicle detection because it allows the officer to passively monitor for wanted vehicles while performing his or her normal duties.”
When it comes to investigations, ALPR technology provides law enforcement with “an ever-increasing toolbox of analytical tools to help determine who the criminals are and where [to] find them,” he says.
Adoption
The 2013 Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics survey found that an estimated 17% (about 2,000) of departments used automated license plate readers, including more than three quarters of the departments serving 100,000 or more residents. ALPR technology has continued to evolve and its uses have become better understood, leading to an increase in adoption.
Some barriers still exist, with cost presenting the biggest obstacle. “Law enforcement technology is growing almost faster than [agencies’] budgets can afford. Body armor, body-worn cameras, dash cameras, fleet vehicles, operational costs…you name it and it’s vying for purchase from the same budget pool,” Fraser says.
“While the individual system cost has come down in the past five years, the solutions still remain expensive when considering the back office hardware (servers) and personnel to manage it,” says Nate Maloney, ELSAG’s VP of Marketing and Communications. “This can be overcome by participating in a regional data sharing program that either shares infrastructure costs with the participating agencies or covers all the costs of the infrastructure outright,” he adds.
“What we are seeing is a lack of understanding as to the full value of an ALPR system,” Crary adds. “When agencies have a narrow view of the value of ALPR, seeing it as a tool for just finding stolen vehicles, for example, they will find it hard to justify. But, when we are able to convey the investigative power to an agency, the value quickly becomes apparent.”
Politics can also present an obstacle, as civilian misunderstanding of the technology has spurred some privacy concerns. “Some citizens think that the use of LPR is Big Brother watching them and tracking where they are going, but that is not true,” says Patrick O. Fox, National Sales Director for LPR and law enforcement operations for SecureWatch 24.
“The truth is, license plates exist for law enforcement identification of vehicles and are required to be visible. There is no inherent or assumed privacy in a license plate, just as anyone can walk down the street and write down a license plate number. License plates do not reveal any personally identifiable information – it is merely alphanumeric characters. The only way to link an anonymous LPR data record to personally identifiable information, like a name, address or face, is to obtain access to a state’s Department of Motor Vehicle database. Access is currently restricted to a handful of permissible purposes by a strong federal law, the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act. This Act carries stiff fines and federal prison penalties for any violation,” explains Tom Joyce, Vigilant Solutions’ Vice President of Business Development, and retired Lieutenant Commander of Detectives at NYPD.
While public misperceptions can be difficult to overcome, education can go a long way. “I’ve seen some agencies reach out to their communities, showing them the technology and educating them on the benefit which ultimately is a safer community,” says Fraser.
Purchasing
There are many factors to consider before purchasing an ALPR system; most importantly, your agency’s needs. “Purchasing an ALPR system without a purpose or understanding of the technology will likely lead to an underutilized system,” warns Crary. “An agency’s need for ALPR will drive the different options they may want to choose.”
“There [also] needs to be buy-in from both the command level and the individual officer level. Too often, I’ve seen systems unused because either the command or the officers using the system did not understand, or did not want to use, the technology,” Crary adds.
“Any agency considering purchasing an ALPR solution should consider the overall cost of the solution, not just the sales price,” Maloney says. “There could be a several thousand dollar difference between vendors when you take into account annual fees and maintenance costs.”
“Agencies should also review their in-house technical expertise to host and maintain the back office system. Not all agencies have the ITS support to operate and manage their own storage server. A shared regional server operated by a larger agency or a cloud-based system might be a better alternative. Finally, agencies should develop operational policies and procedures before deployment,” he adds.
“A city or police department must consider the solution’s flexibility. If they already have cameras deployed, will the ALPR solution work with them, or will they need to ‘rip and replace’ some of what is already there? If they do not already have cameras, how expensive will the cameras be that they have to buy?” suggests Kelly Haines, Director of Marketing at PlateSmart Technologies. Agencies “should be looking at the best performing LPR camera and not always the price point,” Fox says.
“Camera performance options to consider are the yield rate (the number of plates read by the camera against the total number of plates which drove past the camera), the read accuracy, closing speed performance, and low light capabilities. Agencies also need to consider whether it is feasible to mount a camera in certain places. Fixed cameras need power, communication, and a good angle for reading plates. Mobile cameras should not obstruct the patrol vehicle’s lightbar, for safety reasons, or the cameras need to be installed on other vehicle surfaces like the trunk or in a covert setting. This is where engineers and sales team[s] can really benefit an agency in determining the best setup for the agency’s needs. Agencies will want easy-to-use software which users will want to use and administrators find simple to maintain,” says Crary.
“Perhaps one of the most important [ALPR features] is the ability to easily share and receive real-time data,” says Joyce. Plate searches, partial plate searches, year/make/model filtering, data security, and the ability to create hotlists to send and receive real-time alerts are also features to consider.
Finally, when purchasing an ALPR system, “ask for a demonstration. Ask for a T&E – make sure your team will be comfortable with the user interface. Find out if there is support both on-site and by phone,” Fraser says.
“The biggest misconception is that an agency is too small to have a system. These systems are meant to be a force multiplier,” Maloney says. “If your human capital is limited, why not allow a technology to enhance their efforts?”
Fixed Versus Mobile or Portable Cameras
One major consideration in purchasing an ALPR system is whether to invest in fixed, mobile or portable camera units or some combination thereof. All “cameras operate in the same way. They capture the image of license plates and translate them into usable data. It ultimately comes down to how the agency wants to use the systems. One agency might conclude that mobile cameras are better for interdiction because the officer can immediately spot the subject vehicle and take action. Additionally, since they are mobile and easily mounted on vehicles, they can be moved across a jurisdiction. However, they require an officer to be operating the vehicle and it is unlikely they operate 24/7, so there is downtime associated with the mobile system. On the other hand, an agency might opt for fixed cameras because they can capture all the traffic which passes a certain point in a jurisdiction 24/7, especially if they can locate the camera at a choke point. The data collected from the fixed camera is reported to a command center where they can dispatch officers or it can be directly passed along to agents in the field working on an investigation. Fixed camera deployments tend to take more thoughtful planning as there are infrastructure requirements needed to hang a camera (i.e., electricity, a hanging structure, DOT permission, etc.). A mobile camera can be installed on a vehicle in about an hour. Ideally, mobile and fixed systems should complement each other in a comprehensive ALPR solution,” notes Maloney.
Portable systems can be a good “in-between” option, Fraser says. “They do not require the permanent installation a fixed system would, but do have the read and capture capabilities of a fixed system. Additionally, they have the mobility and flexibility of a mobile system, but don’t require a human to operate. It’s also an option if an agency already has radar speed or VMS trailers and wants to just retrofit them for ALPR,” she notes.
The Future of ALPR
While cameras are expected to become smaller, more accurate and easier to deploy in the near future, the biggest advancements in the industry are likely to be to ALPR software.
“Our solutions can already recognize more than just license plate numbers; they can also detect state jurisdictions and vehicle make. In the near future, we will be adding the ability to recognize vehicle color and type,” Haines says.
“Easier ways to transform and read ‘big data’ to help identify and eradicate criminal hotspots, interrupt trafficking patterns and solve criminal cases are where more agencies are gearing,” says Fraser.
Expect to see an increase in software customization for individual agency needs, as well as increased collaboration between agencies, Maloney says.
“I believe we will see more powerful alerting and analytical tools. Law enforcement needs that ability to find a needle in haystack – that is always the goal,” says Joyce. “They need to get answers easier and faster.”
ALPR Products
ELSAG
ELSAG’s Plate Hunter M6™ is a mobile ALPR system comprised of externally mounted digital cameras which can read plates while stationary or at highway speeds. The system compares the plate numbers to a hotlist stored on the in-car computer and automatically broadcasts hits to the patrol officer and his command center.
The Plate Hunter F2™ fixed ALPR system can be mounted to bridges, overpasses and other structures to constantly monitor sensitive areas. Cameras with built-in processors, a field control unit and proprietary software capture images of license plates, crosschecking each with hotlists to identify vehicles of interest. Alarms are broadcast in real time to a command center, patrolling vehicles and/or mobile devices for immediate reaction.
The ELSAG CarSystem™ application monitors the activity of the ALPR cameras connected to the onboard PC. It gives the user a view of the license plates being read, alarms generated by those reads when compared against hotlists and reports the status of the system.
ELSAG’s Enterprise Operations Center™ manages all Plate Hunter mobile, fixed and covert ALPR cameras with features for data security, access and auditing. The EOC uploads and archives both read and alarm data coming from all of the vehicles and fixed cameras and manages the distribution of the plate database, or hotlist, to ALPR units.
NDI Recognition Systems
Engineered for mobile ALPR applications, the V-230 delivers large functionality in a small package. With its compact form and low profile, the V-230 offers a small dual sensor (infrared and color) LPR camera which is easily mountable on the lightbar, trunk lid or behind the grill of a patrol vehicle or installed elsewhere for covert applications.
The C320 Automated License Plate Recognition camera is designed for versatile operation and deployment as a fixed ALPR camera. The C320 is available with a wide range of camera and infrared illumination options offering flexibility in any fixed site ALPR application.
The Road Warrior system is a cost-effective radar (speed) or VMS (message) trailer with a full LPR system which can be deployed quickly and covertly. The Road Warrior system captures all license plate image data passing through the LPR camera’s field of view, reads it and wirelessly transmits the data and alerts the VISCE (Vehicle Intelligence Server/Communications Engine) and a variety of other assets, including patrol vehicles, handheld devices, control rooms, dispatch centers, and real-time crime centers.
PlateSmart
The Analytic Recognition Enterprise Solution (ARES) is PlateSmart’s end-to-end enterprise Vehicle Recognition Identification analytical back-end platform. ARES uses true object recognition instead of traditional optical character recognition technology and features an open architecture which is designed to be highly scalable and integrate with any VMS or third-party software.
The ARES Viewer is a stand-alone application with an interface which allows widespread access to vehicle recognition data and alerts in real time. The ARES Viewer communicates vital information and allows you to view real-time data from anywhere, at any time, through a VPN connection to your network.
PIPS Technology (a Business of Neology, Inc.)
The P492 Fixed Wide Lane ALPR Camera is a self-illuminating, LED infrared camera, contained within a single watertight enclosure. P492’s onboard OCR reads license plates directly, independent of network or back-end system availability or workload.
The P634 Mobile ALPR Camera is a dual camera which incorporates infrared illumination for license plate imaging and a color camera to provide a vehicle overview image. Using a proprietary technique, known internally as “Triple-Flash” technology, this covert camera can effectively suppress ambient light such as headlights and bright sunlight.
The Mobile ALPR Processor SX4 simultaneously supports up to four dual (color and infrared) mobile ALPR cameras. With wireless communication, it was designed specifically for on-street law enforcement environments. In addition, an automated shutdown feature protects the processor from damage due to power surges.
Plate Alert Analytical ALPR Software features pattern management alerts. Notifications are sent when the system detects activity matching a predefined pattern which may suggest illicit activity.
SecureWatch 24
The AutoVu™ Sharp and SharpX are designed to provide accurate plate reads, even at high speeds, in bad weather or at poor angles.
AutoVu Patroller is the in-vehicle control interface of the AutoVu system, providing accessible features for officers onboard and allowing them to monitor incoming reads from LPR cameras.
Security Center is a unified security platform providing real-time monitoring of AutoVu events, alarm management, as well as advanced data mining and reporting capabilities. As license plate reads and hits are gathered from patrolling units in the field and from fixed AutoVu Sharp units, information is relayed to Security Center operators. In the case of fixed applications, not only can operators monitor the incoming reads from LPR cameras, but they can also view live video which is captured from the Sharp camera.
Vigilant Solutions
Vigilant Solutions’ ALPR system, LEARN, features a ruggedized and compact dual lens (infrared and color) LPR camera engineered for extreme conditions. The camera recognizes license plates in the camera’s field of view, matches against various agency hotlists and notifies law enforcement of matches. The system can also stream live video to a separate location such as a video management system.
The Target Alert Service allows for alerts from fixed camera vehicle sightings to be broadcast from LEARN to any computer or mobile device. A published Application Programming Interface (API) allows for custom applications such as gate triggering and communications with external systems.
Automatic car number plate recognition here
Douglas Council is introducing automatic number plate recognition to replace tickets in two of its main car parks.
The ticketless system is being brought in at Shaw’s Brow and Bottleneck car parks and will also provide more ways to pay. As well as using cash and cards, customers will be able to pay through the Glide parking app on Android and IOS devices, or by setting up a credit account.
Pre-payment card holders will be able to transfer credit to the new system.
The council says the system should prove more reliable and convenient. It has provided a step-by-step guide to how the system works:
It works by recognising the user’s registration number, so customers will need to know their vehicle’s registration number to pay and exit the car park as well as to set up a credit account.
As the vehicle approaches the entry barrier, the system captures an image of the registration number, the barrier lifts and the customer parks as usual.
On returning, the customer uses one of the pay stations, puts in their vehicle registration number then pays the fee displayed, using cash, debit or credit card or the Glide app.
The customer returns to their vehicle, drives to the exit where the barrier will match the registration number against the payment made and lift to allow the vehicle out.
A council spokesman said the parking rates would be unchanged. All contract customers would be sent full instructions.
Blue badge holders can apply to receive the additional free hour. They are asked to bring their bring blue badge to the finance department in the town hall to register.
Work to upgrade the car parks will began today.
The spokesman added: ’The council hopes to minimise any disruption during the transition and asks for customers’ patience in the early weeks of the new system going live when personnel will be on hand to assist users with any problems.’
Wednesday, August 23, 2017
Speed Enforcement System Applied in Turkey
On average speed corridor roads, fatal accidents decreased by 29 percent,
deaths by 35.9 percent, injured by 15.2 percent and traffic accidents by 1.8
percent. According to the statement made by the General Directorate of
Security, Electronic Control Systems, which was established as an average speed
corridor on the highways in order to prevent deaths and injuries caused by traffic
accidents, was active on 1 July. The speed enforcement system was intended to prevent drivers
from driving on speed limits, to reduce the number of fatal accidents due to
excessive speed, to minimize the harm caused by exhaust emissions, and to ease
the burden on imports of high fuel consumption due to overspeed. When the
average speed corridor was compared with the same period of the same period
last year, it was determined that the rate of mortal traffic accident decreased
by 29 percent, death by 35.9 percent, injury by 15.2 percent and traffic
accident by 1.8 percent.
According to ANTALYA Police
Department, there are 4 thousand 827 women from 5 thousand 540 drivers involved
in mortal and wounded traffic accident that took place in 2016 and 613 men. The
most frequent accident occurred on Fridays, the first order speed in the order
of the rules that the drivers violated the most.
Antalya Security Directorate
'Annual Traffic Research and Development Activities' announced the data they
prepared. A lot of issues related to traffic were addressed in the data that
draw attention to the fact that such kind of work was done in order to reduce
the troubles experienced in traffic and to guide them.
The work also mentioning the
burden of public transportation vehicles on the road, was published in the year
of 2016. According to the number of people using public transportation last
month, 8 million 406 thousand 707, 326 thousand 387 daily use was announced. It
is stated that citizens mostly use public transportation at the beginning and
end of work hours.
2015 and 2016 data of fatal and
wounded traffic accidents were also shared. In 2016 in the province, 54 deaths,
6 thousand 229 injuries, a total of 6 thousand 283 traffic accidents have been
revealed. 70 people lost their lives in this accident, 9 thousand 493 people
were injured. According to the year 2015, it was observed that mortal accidents
decreased by 34 percent and injured accidents by 2 percent. In addition, it is
stated that the accidents are increasing in the tourism season in most of the
year, and the day when the accidents occurred most frequently is recorded as
Friday.
On average speed corridor roads, fatal accidents decreased by 29 percent, deaths by 35.9 percent, injured by 15.2 percent and traffic accidents by 1.8 percent. According to the statement made by the General Directorate of Security, Electronic Control Systems, which was established as an average speed corridor on the highways in order to prevent deaths and injuries caused by traffic accidents, was active on 1 July. The system was intended to prevent drivers from driving on speed limits, to reduce the number of fatal accidents due to excessive speed, to minimize the harm caused by exhaust emissions, and to ease the burden on imports of high fuel consumption due to overspeed. When the average speed corridor was compared with the same period of the same period last year, it was determined that the rate of mortal traffic accident decreased by 29 percent, death by 35.9 percent, injury by 15.2 percent and traffic accident by 1.8 percent.
According to ANTALYA Police
Department, there are 4 thousand 827 women from 5 thousand 540 drivers involved
in mortal and wounded traffic accident that took place in 2016 and 613 men. The
most frequent accident occurred on Fridays, the first order speed in the order
of the rules that the drivers violated the most.
Antalya Security Directorate
'Annual Traffic Research and Development Activities' announced the data they
prepared. A lot of issues related to traffic were addressed in the data that
draw attention to the fact that such kind of work was done in order to reduce
the troubles experienced in traffic and to guide them.
The work also mentioning the
burden of public transportation vehicles on the road, was published in the year
of 2016. According to the number of people using public transportation last
month, 8 million 406 thousand 707, 326 thousand 387 daily use was announced. It
is stated that citizens mostly use public transportation at the beginning and
end of work hours.
2015 and 2016 data of fatal and
wounded traffic accidents were also shared. In 2016 in the province, 54 deaths,
6 thousand 229 injuries, a total of 6 thousand 283 traffic accidents have been
revealed. 70 people lost their lives in this accident, 9 thousand 493 people
were injured. According to the year 2015, it was observed that mortal accidents
decreased by 34 percent and injured accidents by 2 percent. In addition, it is
stated that the accidents are increasing in the tourism season in most of the
year, and the day when the accidents occurred most frequently is recorded as
Friday.
QUICK IMPORTANCE IN ACCIDENTS
When the data on the occurrence of traffic accidents are
examined;Respectively, the most side impact,
impact to the bulwark and rear impact.
In the order of the rules which the drivers
most violate, the first order speeded up.
According to this, 44% of the accidents were not to
reduce the speed while not approaching the intersections,
not to obey the right to cross the intersection,
14% to adjust speed according to road, air and
traffic, and 10% to turn right and left.
CAR PARKING
Safety, which evaluates traffic problems in 3 sections, stated
that the majority of domestic and foreign tourists come to
Antalya with their vehicles because of being a tourism city
and this situation causes serious concentration. Daily
5 thousand heavy tonnage vehicle entering and leaving
the city also determines the safety of the city's
reconstruction plan is old and the parking lot is not as
much as the parking lot caused by the problem explained.
At the beginning of the problems arising from the drivers,
inexperience was the excessive speed, whereas in
the second insomnia the driving was in the third place.
CRD continues call for Malahat speed cameras
A two-pronged approach to a plan to reduce the number of speeders on the Malahat should carry more weight with the provincial government, says Saanich Coun. Colin Plant.
While Plant admitted it’s ironic to have a discussion on speeding while the Malahat is plagued by slowdowns resulting from ongoing construction and blasting, he noted, it’s still important to address the viability of interval-based cameras on that stretch of highway before the work is completed. “Any long-term improvements to safety are always welcome,” he said.
Plant, chair of the Capital Regional District’s traffic safety commission, said the commission has approached the Cowichan Valley Regional District about joining with the CRD to petition the provincial government to install interval-based cameras.
The CVRD’s response indicated that more information is needed before a decision can be made, Plant said.
The CRD asked the CVRD this week to schedule a presentation by the traffic safety commission that would provide more detail about the interval-based camera proposal at the next CVRD meeting in September.
Interval-based cameras record licence plates at various intervals to determine the vehicle’s speed.
Plant said research on their use at a problem location in Scotland resulted in reduction of speeding vehicles from 33 per cent to five per cent.
The results from a location in China were even more dramatic, with only two per cent of drivers speeding, down from 50 per cent. The technology was introduced in Ontario and Alberta recently, but there hasn’t been sufficient time to compile data yet, Plant noted. “If you know the cameras are there and you’re going to get a ticket, you’re going to slow down,” Plant said.
Although he is aware that B.C. Attorney-General David Eby has indicated the NDP government is not considering a return to photo radar enforcement, Plant believes interval-based cameras constitute a different approach that is well worth considering.
“It’s not like photo radar where drivers watch for vans that move from one location to another,” he explained. “We want people to know the cameras are there and they need to slow down,” he said.
Plant also believes the provincial government may be more amenable to considering the new option because of the financial challenges currently facing ICBC, pointing out that less drivers speeding means less accidents and less claims.
“Interval-based cameras create changes in behaviour by having the road monitored 24 hours a day.”
The CRD traffic safety commission’s mandate is to improve safety through education and recommendations arrived at by consultation with representatives from ICBC, law enforcement, the coroner’s office, the media, medical health and the public, Plant explained. “We don’t have the capacity to make suggestions based on engineering,” he noted.
The board recently added representatives from the Greater Victoria Cycling Coalition and Walk On Victoria – a pedestrian advocacy group – to provide more diversity, he added.
Speed camera catches same vehicle 14 times
AN
ABSENT-minded speeding driver has been caught out more than a dozen times by
new speed cameras.
The
dozy driver has been captured 14 times by new average speed cameras along
Brighton’s seafront which only began operating at the end of May.
The
camera has captured hundreds of law-breakers behind the wheel in a matter of
weeks including one speeder who is facing a court appearance after driving at
more than double the 30mph speed limit.
Road
safety bosses said the effectiveness of the cameras in reducing accidents would
be reviewed before a decision on rolling them out across the county was taken.
The
first permanent average speed cameras in the county were installed by Sussex
Safer Roads Partnership (SSRP) in Marine Parade, Brighton, and between the
Marina and Grosvenor Crescent in Hastings earlier this year and went live at
the end of May.
Between
then and the first week of August, more than 1,800 vehicles have been caught
travelling at more than 36mph along the Brighton coastal road including one
driver clocked travelling at 63mph.
The
rate of offenders is lower than during tests last year when almost a tenth of
drivers travelling along Marine Parade in Brighton, which carries 27,000
vehicles a month, were found to exceed the 36mph threshold for receiving a £100
fine.
Drivers
caught travelling at more than 36mph can elect to have their case heard at
court, with speed awareness courses offered to offenders caught between 36mph
and 42mph.
Motorists
driving at 50mph or over are summonsed to court.
A
SSRP spokeswoman said: “The overall compliance is in excess of 99.6 per cent of
vehicle total movements which we hope will further improve in the future but
does show the vast majority of road users are aware of and comply with the
scheme.
“A
great deal of effort went in to publicising the scheme prior to enforcement
taking place, using local and social media plus variable messages on the
roadside to ensure high compliance.
“The
new schemes will be subject to a review by the partnership to establish their
effectiveness in reducing collisions.
“Decisions
about further schemes will then be made in conjunction with the local highway
authorities who are partnership members.
“Each
scheme has to be costed on a scheme by scheme basis.”
The
spokeswoman added that repeat offenders could face tougher penalties should
they already have sufficient points on their licence or if the licence holder
has attended a speed awareness course in the last three years.
Slow down: School zones and speed cameras are back in action
Authorities are urging drivers to be mindful of school zones as a new school year begins -- and are reminding drivers that mobile and fixed traffic cameras are there to catch them if they speed.
Officials with the New Orleans Police Department and Orleans Parish School Board said at a press conference Monday (Aug. 14) that more cameras, as listed by the city earlier this year, will be coming online in the near future.
Officials noted that a new fixed camera has been placed in the school zone by William J. Fischer Accelerated Academy in Algiers. Mobile cameras will also be deployed throughout the L.B. Landry – O.P. Walker College and Career Preparatory High School corridor during the year, NOPD Chief Michael Harrison said during a press conference outside of L.B. Landry.
Harrison stressed that traffic enforcement is intended to reduce crashes that lead to injuries and death.
"The children are our top priority, the teachers and the educators and the faculty are our top priority, and we want them to have a very great school year, so we're asking people to slow down because there will be consequences for those who are speeding in our school zones creating an unsafe environment," said Harrison on behalf of law enforcement and school officials.
School zone camera footage has shown vehicles speeding far over the 20 mph limit in some areas -- even reaching above 50 mph. Harrison called those driving behaviors "reckless and dangerous" as he advised drivers to keep in mind that school programs are back in session.
School zones are in effect between 7 and 9 a.m. and from 2:45 to 4:45 p.m. Harrison added after the conference that these zones are only in effect when school is in session.
To trigger a camera, a driver must be going at least 10 mph above the speed limit in a non-school zone and 6 mph faster in a school zone. The cameras will work 24 hours, changing the speed they are set for before and after school zone hours.
Harrison reminded drivers hoping to contest camera tickets that they will have "to argue against the technology" photographing their vehicles speeding. The process for contesting camera tickets can be found here online. Existing camera locations can be found here.
Monday's announcement also drew attention to the return of school resource officers on campuses citywide. The officers will work with students and administrators throughout the school year to build relationships that establish "positive encounters with law enforcement," Harrison said.
"Each NOPD district has a school resource officer that provides services and resources to the schools within their district," Harrison said. "They play an integral role in the NOPD community policing philosophy."
Harrison acknowledged after the conference that the NOPD does not have enough officers to put one in every school. He said each officer working the schools in their district will be communicating with school principals. The officers will network "primarily" with "high schools where there's the greatest need, and middle schools secondarily," he added.
He said "at some point" they will look into putting more officers at schools as the NOPD grows.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)